|
DARK ENERGY So the reason we can assume this tensor mesh of gravitational binding of mass energy to spacetime is true is because in areas where there is less localized gravitational attraction we see more expansion of space time taking place. Inside galaxies and inside planetary systems the localized tensor mesh strength is strong enough that the expansion of spacetime is unmeasurable. It is only in the areas where gravitational attraction is weaker as in the voids between galaxies where we can really see signs of expansion. So if we have an infinite Universe where our entire localized pocket of spacetime massenergy has a parent pocket of spacetime and that parent has a parent and that parent has a parent in infinite succession then every parent passes its perception of the passage of time down to its children. The space time of our solar system is provided by the Milky Way which gets its spacetime from the local group and eventually from Laniakea and the visible universe. Which in turn gets its spacetime from a larger pocket and inside that pocket there are usually more than one object of a certain scale factor. It is an almost certainty in my mind that our Post has siblings. I feel our Post, our largest measureable pocket of relative spacetime massenergy , has a relative velocity and trajectory that is shared with other pockets. Other localized little universes like ours sharing a frame of reference. The densest of them would most likely be central and the others either in orbit or attracting to it. At each larger scale factor the frame of reference would have collections of matter acting very much like our systems, and galaxies, and clusters do. The most massive objects usually end up with less massive objects in orbit around them and this continues forever in infinite succession. But even though the natural tendency is to attract and gravity causes objects to merge and collide or enter into orbits that is only a transient state. There is no permanent orbits because all orbits eventually decay. An orbit is a transfer of energy from linear momentum to angular momentum but there is not an infinite amount of energy present and some amount of energy gets used up over time and so all orbits eventually decay. Every orbit regardless of scale factor shares one truth. There is always going to be a finite amount of relative mass inside every orbit and an infinite amount of relative mass outside every orbit. The gravitational attraction pulling on every object coming from outside that object's orbit will always contain more mass than the mass contained inside the orbit. That does not equate to the gravitational attraction being stronger trying to dislodge every object from its orbit just that there is more of it and that is why every orbit will eventually decay. So if our Post gets it's spacetime from our parent pocket which gets its relative spacetime from our grandparent and at every scale factor there is a tensor mesh of localized gravitational attraction binding the massenergy to spacetime for every larger successive pocket of space time then at every scale factor the natural tendency of the tensor mesh at that scale factor is to dissipate. Every tensor mesh at every scale factor is always dissipating and getting weaker because the objects themselves are naturally tending to spread apart. We see this now inside our solar system , our galaxy, and even our moon. We see the natural tendency of the orbits to slowly degrade and slowly get larger and planetary systems get larger over time and galaxies get larger over time and that is a spreading out of matter and massenergy cohesion to spacetime, not related directly to the expansion of spacetime. As objects loose cohesive mass over time that adds to the dissipation of tensor mesh strength also. So we have successive parent frames of reference handing down relative spacetime to each child but every tensor mesh that binds mass energy to spacetime at that scale factor is naturally trying to move apart from each other. This dissipation of the tensor mesh strength of successive parent frames of reference would look to us inside our visible universe as if the very fabric of space time was being torn apart. And that is what we do see. We see the areas were our localized tensor mesh strength is strong enough that its able to fight off the expansion and keep it at bay but in the areas where its weak we can see the dissipation of parent tensor mesh strength takes over and spacetime expands. It can only expand because we borrowed our spacetime from our parent pocket and that parent pockets spacetime is stretching out. It is doing so because it got its spacetime from its parent and that parents spacetime is also stretching out. If we accept the very likely reality that our Universe is infinitely vast then cohesive pockets of space time orbiting each other in a never ending succession would certainly make sense and so just using the observations of how gravity is holding together our localized relative space time (or at least trying to) it is not difficult to interpolate the existence of a tensor mesh created by spheres of influence truly representing the natural state of nature. I predict we will soon find the rate of expansion differs across the known universe and the baking raisin bread model will be found to be very clumpy. That would coincide with how the tensor mesh binds to spacetime and the rate of expansion we calculate is not universal. We will find variations in the rate of expansion between galaxies of different mass. #darkenergy #tensormeshdissipation earth-is-drifting-away-from-the-sun-and-so-are-all-the-planets www.sci-news.com/astronomy/milky-way-size
#thenaturalstateofnature
All the darkness in the entire vast multiverse can not defeat the flame of a single candle.
|